i never asked you to gang up on Homero

Scott,

i never asked you to gang up on Homero. I have meet him briefly in the past and the man has not done anything disrespectful to me. I have no reason to hate him. He has always treated me with me with respect the same way I have always treated him when we run into eachother.

I did meet with you one night when you put up a ugly blog about myself because somehome you felt that i was involved with an attack against you. You told me that you thought I called the Bob Jones show and made negative comments about yourself. At that meeting i told you that i didn't make those comments. Then you told me about how you and John Kelly had got into it and demanding that I tell him to stop using your name on internet blogs. John Kelly did not have anything to do with it. I asked him. You then told me that anytime anyone says or prints something negative about you, that you were going to retaliate against me.

With all do respect Scott I am going to tell you the same thing I told you then. "I haven't been involved with any of the attacks against you or your wife leeann."

It is true that we have had some disagreements about some of the individuals you tried to hammer. Juan Garcia, Solly Jr. & Sr., and many other politicians. Its not right that you believe that just because you hate them or have negative feelings toward them that I should hate them as well. Scott, these individuals have not done anything negative to me. I do remember you telling me that you were upset with Juan Garcia because as you stated, you asked Juan if you could work for him and he told you that he would call you. You said that Juan never called you and that he F'd up and you were going to go after him. I did not agree with you going after Juan Garcia for something as innocent as that. Maybe he forgot to call you or lost your number. I mean its not like if he went and stole your wife. Then i would understand hating the man. Just because you dislike some of the local politicans or my fellow democrats, that does not mean i have to hate them aswell. Thats all im saying on that.

There are some issues that i agree with you on. Like the Del Mar issues. I agree with you on some of your del mar issues but not all of them.

Scott, one thing that i have learned is that the best way a person can piss off their enemies is by SUCCESS, by doing something positive. By accomplishing major achievents while leaving their enemies bickering and broke.

Scott, even though i have done nothing against you, I know you hate me and well, the only thing i can say is that its unfortunate that you were given false information about myself and decided to hate me.

Scott, if you ever need any help with something POSITIVE, give me a call.

Now if you can please excuse me, I have a business tor run.

Re(1): You sound jealous
Posted on December 31, 2006 at 04:10:29 AM by Rowland

Scott,

W: "i never asked you to gang up on Homero."

JK: Yes you did. Many people know this is true. Why do you start out with a lie? You just screwed yourself little boy. Thank you for revealing it to everyone. Man, I bet Homero will have a smile at this one. Another thing, why were you sitting on the fence and not supporting El Defenzor Paper when the Heron tore it up? We all know you had your nose up somebody.


RW: "I have meet him briefly in the past and the man has not done anything disrespectful to me."

JK: But you have committed acts of treachery towards him nonetheless. Everybody knows this about you "little boy".


RW: "I have no reason to hate him."

JK: With Homero, El Defenzor and the Defender network "this thing of ours'" it is about AMORE. Ask Homero he will tell you.

RW: "He has always treated me with me with respect the same way I have always treated him when we run into eachother."

JK: You are a coward and you are always two faced, everybody knows this to be true as well.

RW: "I did meet with you one night when you put up a ugly blog about myself because somehome you felt that i was involved with an attack against you."


JK: You and your Socialismos were attecking not only myself but El Defenzor, Homero and anybody who stood with Homero. The Heron tried to use South Texas and you tried to help hand him the Nueces Democratic Party. You only divided it and now you are starting to feel the reverb. Things not working out? That company, how long do you think you (even with your partners) are going to last with you prevarication. You are a burn and everyone is beginning to realize your ways of flattery and bullshit.


RW: "You told me that you thought I called the Bob Jones show and made negative comments about yourself."


JK: No, I said you were making derogatory comments and claiming the Heron's not a Socialismo. You came into this room and the reason I know it was you is because you were fed certain information and that information was especially for you. No way it would have came from anywhere else. It was your signature and I am sure we have a record of the comments and the IP address.

RW: "At that meeting i told you that i didn't make those comments. Then you told me about how you and John Kelly had got into it and demanding that I tell him to stop using your name on internet blogs. John Kelly did not have anything to do with it. I asked him. You then told me that anytime anyone says or prints something negative about you, that you were going to retaliate against me."

JK: I told you that you were the whipping boy because of your signature feedback, information that only you were given with specific little meanders that revealed you. It is strange how every time you got spanked the problem was alleviated. They justed stopped for no reason eh?

RW:"With all do respect Scott I am going to tell you the same thing I told you then. "I haven't been involved with any of the attacks against you or your wife leeann."

JK: You lied then and you are lying now and the breakfast club knows it all too well.

RW: "It is true that we have had some disagreements about some of the individuals you tried to hammer. Juan Garcia, Solly Jr. & Sr., and many other politicians."


JK: Garcia yes. Solly rode my articles to victory. Google em Kenedeno & Solomon Ortiz Jr. or Sr. I have not hammered them. Sr. did refer to Homero as "veneno" and it was definitely addressed. Solly, I did what I was asked to do by Solly and that was remain friends with Homero. I asked Solly to run as a Democrat only, and drop the Progressive Label. That is turning out to byte you guys in the ass. Now, who will you align with Juan or Solly? Well, you know where I stand on that one.


RW: "Its not right that you believe that just because you hate them or have negative feelings toward them that I should hate them as well."

JK: DUDE, as if I would ever have asked you hate anyone nor do I hate anyone. Just because documentation proves them liars and it invokes the passion of the little person in my heart and the words have the effect like the water on the wicked witch. Hey if you cant take the heat get the hell out of the kitchen.


RW: Scott, these individuals have not done anything negative to me. I do remember you telling me that you were upset with Juan Garcia because as you stated, you asked Juan if you could work for him and he told you that he would call you. You said that Juan never called you and that he F'd up and you were going to go after him."

JK: Not quite what I told you. I said he shook my hand, asked me to start writing and when he started getting his warchest he could pay me down the road. And yes, he did F up.


RW: "I did not agree with you going after Juan Garcia for something as innocent as that. Maybe he forgot to call you or lost your number."


JK:Yeah right, Juan called me several times and asked me to write and I did. Maybe one day you will get to see the emails and you can ask Vicente and Joe Elizondo. That is BS and you know it. Man this whole thing you wrote is a bunch of BS. Incompetence exudes in your weak attempt to salvage any credibility at all but the people who will read this tomorrow know you and they know me. You know by now that it was a big mistake to write this bs. I must commend your effort and at least you did it this time under your name, at least you got that barbed wire out and at least jumped down on one side of the fence. Good for you. I dont hate you but I refuse to stand around while you run around stinkin up the place. Talking behind one's back here in South Texas is a no no and everybody knows you are infamous for that.


RA: "I mean its not like if he went and stole your wife. Then i would understand hating the man. Just because you dislike some of the local politicans or my fellow democrats, that does not mean i have to hate them aswell. Thats all im saying on that."


JK: If you are around any cause I fight for it is because you want to be there not because I asked you. I have never asked you for help. I have tried to help you realize it was a losing battle to go against Homero and the defender network (at least with respect to this issue).

RW: "There are some issues that i agree with you on. Like the Del Mar issues. I agree with you on some of your del mar issues but not all of them."

JK: And????

RW: "Scott, one thing that i have learned is that the best way a person can piss off their enemies is by SUCCESS, by doing something positive. By accomplishing major achievents while leaving their enemies bickering and broke."

JK: Yeap, that is what you and your's tried to do to Homero and El Defenzor.

RW: "Scott, even though i have done nothing against you, I know you hate me and well, the only thing i can say is that its unfortunate that you were given false information about myself and decided to hate me."

JK: I bet you not even one Politico will fall for that crap. But I do not hate you. I hope for you and I hope that you will understand that I will always help you.

RW: Scott, if you ever need any help with something POSITIVE, give me a call.

JK: Help yourself, I dont need your help.

RW: "Now if you can please excuse me, I have a business tor run."


JK: Aztec Energy Solutions I understand, does have some very decent rates. A prosperous New Year to you and your partners. I wish you well.

Scott

Give this young man a chance, YES.....

Give this young man a chance, YES.....
Posted on December 26, 2006 at 06:56:43 AM by Kenedeno

"and cut the labels?"

Solly refused to run as an unlabeled Democrat he said,"he liked the progressive label". The motivation to liase with the anti american air and a ready made newspaper rewriting the definition of a democrat and calling others DINO's while them theirselves were trojans horses piggy backing a vulnerable ready made power structure in the Nueces Democratic party. The obvious wrong in that this element poked the eyes of many and this is where Solly ties into "letting them in". Something happened which brings Grande and Lencho (did he (Lencho) go to Mikal? make the BND dirt go away?). I mean even back in the Pete Alvarez campaign the Robstown Prison Project was involved and who controls that? Delay right? Omega and DOS Logistics go from the bottom to the top of the food chain with OSI and Shipholdings defense contracting and "Sipholding". Lencho and Grande are trying to act like they are going their own direction but they have way too much history to have an ugly "divorce". The Subversives, the Socialismos, have exploited the 27th Congressional District but the blackmailers will now continue to make the move. Watch for Solly to separate as they become adversarial siding with San Antonio Henry Cisneros and the congressional alliances. Solly and Mikal are on opposite ends.

As far as Labels Solly wore the modifying label like an athlete wears a sponsor's label and IMO he knows he was backstabbed by the heron and so does the Nueces Democrats.

He has the chance.

Get to work Jr.

Joe A Ortiz (National Civil Rights Director, American GI Forum) Writes Letter to the Caller Times (and it got published)

Should step down

We know that Del Mar College President Carlos Garcia is responsible to the Board of Regents. However, President Garcia should be more responsible to the public. His actions are compromising education at Del Mar.

Del Mar President Garcia should relinquish his position until the present investigation is completed.

The board is doing a disservice to the public by keeping Del Mar President Garcia as president while there is a cloud of suspicion and his integrity is being questioned and investigated.

Joe Ortiz

(Civil Rights Director,

National GI Forum)

Del Mar Electronic Anonymous Input Forum: What is Mike West so afraid of ?

Del Mar Electronic Anonymous Input Forum: What is Mike West so afraid of ?

Dear Ed Cohn and Distinguished Faculty Members and you to Mike, CG and the like

Subject: Update on Law Suits Involving Sexual Misconduct Against the President.


Ed: Sadly, our concerns that Professor Olson and his associates would continue to
try to embarrass Del Mar have been proven yet again.

JK: This is not an embarrassment to Del Mar but only the expose of a few Del Mar Yanquis.

Ed Cohn: Professors Olson and Samsing went on KRIS and reported that Del Mar had failed to fully investigate an SGA off-campus scandal.

JK: First of all it is Dr Sansing not Samsing but we will forgive the typo. Second, if this Del Mar College / SGA / Select Faculty / President CGTA / In House Counsel Approved Event at Port Royal would have been conducted properly there would be nothing to report and nothing to investigate. Now that being said, we all know this attaches to the "adults" who were aware and present whether they they partook of the vices or not; they all played a part. Here are some answers Mr Cohn.

Why was the investigation conducted in an unwholesome manner, overlooking the sexual acts that are now well documented regarding only a bare minimum of partakers?

Why were select students singled out when there were many who were equally responsible?

Why was there no resolution within DMC (EEOC or Administration).

Were students expelled so as to cover up further culpability of the "adults" in attendance. Donna Strong's letter conveys her self serving message as we all know she is a little angel. Was Carlos Garcia in attendance? Was Mike Westergren in attendance? Did Carlos Garcia ask Joseph Ramirez any questions? Was Jose Rivera in attendance?

These are serious issues Mr Cohn.

Is that why we send our youth to Del Mar College, so they can learn how to do things halfway? Or is it so they can have their "due process" thwarted? Or......? I am sure you get the message.

Your lament is very disingenuous and obsequious in nature no doubt.

Ed: This SGA event apparently occurred about a year ago
and was investigated by Jose Rivera, VPSD. Then EEO Teresa Cox was also
involved. The implication is that the investigation was truncated because Del
Mar, under the current President, allows sexual harassment.

************************************************************************************

This comment from a Del Mar Housekeeping Anonymous Input source regarding the Del Mar College / SGA / Select Faculty / President CGTA / In House Counsel Approved Event at Port Royal.

The most important point has been missed concerning this Del Mar thing. All student groups have college authorized advisors. They are supposed to be there to monitor and chaperon these events. The details of what happened in November, to my knowledge, did not come forward until January. What took so long? Why didn’t the advisors stop all this stuff at the time? It seems to me that the advisors have a lot to answer for and other head should have rolled here?

Where were the advisors when all this was going on?

Why are those advisors still working at Del Mar College?

Why were they let off the hook?

JK: The Del Mar College / SGA / Select Faculty / President CGTA / In House Counsel Approved Event at Port Royal occurred November 2005. This story was Nationally Recognized and published by MSNBC and Mr Cohn beckons as to whose credibility? So why was the investigation truncated Mr Cohn? And say Ms Cox was involved; we have all witnessed the documentation here and here with Ms Cox acting in adverse interest to the students and the due process. Was the DMC EEO Officer acting independently or under directives from Admin and In House Counsel? From the documents it is clear she was not acting in the interest of JUSTICE. And while it comes to my mind the question must be asked, "why is this situation happening (with regularity) at DMC and not at TAMUK or TAMUCC". Why is this crap happening while a common group has retained control?

Ed: You can also expect to see a Foghorn article tomorrow concerning the release of
a Baker/Box report for the Regent's of the Administration's conduct with regard
to Teresa Cox's employment. I do not know what the Foghorn will report, but I
have placed a call to the editor, Ms. Edwards.

JK: The "Baker / BOX Report" Mr Cohn???

LOL

And I suppose you are going to claim to have read this report as well?

Ed: A few weeks ago, the Olson group wanted the President removed from office
because he personally was accused of sexual harassment. Let's go through the
status of the law suits that allege this:

JK: Mr Cohn, we asked for Del Mar President Carlos Garcia to be placed on administrative leave pending the outcome of the investigations.

Ed: 1. The Lopez case. Despite repeated reports that Ms. Lopez wore a wire and "had"
the President, the tape was never produced for trial. The suit appears likely to
be settled at its nuisance value, if that. Anyone who doubts the paucity of the
accusation needs to go the Federal Court and read the statements of the Federal
Judge in granting the individual defendants summary judgment.

JK: Nuisance Value Mr Cohn? If the statements of the Judge were so damning to the Plaintiff's; why would the defendant's give them one cent? A settlement is an admission of guilt and is usually to prevent the meat and potatoes of a case from public scrutiny. There is also a very valid question as to the fact that Mike Westergren is a former Judge and you can figure out from that point. Is the Judge performing in a quasi jurisdictional interest as Judge and Jury as well? I question the integrity of anyone who reads the Court Documents and can still deny there is a viable issue at hand. And remember that depo of Gabe Rivas? The voters seen right through all of the rhetoric and voted him out. That is from the Federal Courthouse. I am sure there is a plethora in the accusations Mr Cohn.

Ed: 2. The Foghorn article about the Lopez (and Benitez) cases (the cases were split
for trial), last week. The attorney for the two accusers says that they were
"satisfied" with the settlements. It is not because of the size of the
settlement. The dismissal of the individual counts insures that the judge was
not impressed with the evidence that the accusers had.

JK: Mr Cohn, you exclaim, "It is not because of the size of the
settlement." as if you know the amount? And you probably have not even considered these victims just want this to be over with? That figures. The Judge is wrong. The Judge is supposed to remain impartial and eventually allow the arguments to be presented to a Jury of 12 (barring a bench trial).

Ed: 3. The Cox allegation. The Baker report to the Regents clears the President of
any actual sexual harassment or intentional wrongdoing. It is critical of the
timing of the non-renewal of Ms. Cox.

JK: Have you read the Baker / BOX report Mr Cohn? No way sir. Maybe if there was such a report you might have read it, but there is no DMC Baker Box report. Also, at DMC when you speak of incompetence and Ms Cox, everybody knows who is the incompetent one; not to mention zero credibility.

Ed: 4. The Parker case. Attorney Heil, the same attorney who was unable to find any
wrongdoing in the Lopez and Benitez cases, is Ms. Parker's attorney in a law
suit filed outside of Del Mar. We should not be trying this case by "tfac"; it
is clear however Ms. Parker has clear ties to Jaime Kenedeno, assuming he is
Mr. Haley, the brother of the "friend" of the accuser of a respected faculty
member; recall that these charges were found to be totally false.

JK: Mr Cohn you claim, "Ms. Parker has clear ties to Jaime Kenedeno"; please by all means elaborate. For the record, we do not know Ms Parker but we have obtained the Police Report detailing the acts of DMC President Carlos Garcia while he was a Biology instructor at DMC.

Part II

Ed: In summary, 2 of the 3 cases are in the process of clearing the President. As we
know, the legal system is not a thing of beauty but it will work

JK: Settling out of court for an undisclosed settlement is indicative of the President’s tenure and his diverse relationship with the now multi tiered Del Mar College faculty, foundation, outsourcing and network if you will. How much was the official settlement amount?

.

Ed: Stripped of their ability to make the case against the President directly, Jaime
Kenedeno was the first to shift the argument. He reported ? Some big mistakes
were made in the Sexual Harassment investigations against (a faculty member)
according to Theresa Cox." (Caution, I have not seen any evidence of Ms. Cox
having said this). The important point is that Ms. Cox was the lead
investigator and found no basis for any of the charges, in a report she signed.

JK: Hey Ed, I don’t know where you have been but it is well documented; my original conflict with Del Mar College. “Ben Blanco brought me into your world”. Nothing has ever shifted, however the information has since, been stacked up and sifted. And the quote from above was copied from the Caller Times Forum Online and it is linked back to the original publication so do your homework lest you prove yourself as you just did. I believe Theresa Cox makes things crystal clear as to her signature (un-coerced).

Everybody (@DMC knows about the abuse of this position. Must we hash through it Mr. Cohn?

Ed: It now appears Prof. Olson is making the same argument: OK, so the President did
not do anything wrong himself, but he wasn't diligent in upholding EEO.

JK: There are many credible facts to go along with the argument Ed. Let’s see if I can name a few right of the bat; The Covered Up of the DMC / SGA / T-fac adm / IHC / CG&TA / SEX ……….

There is a settlement. Ed calls it a Nuisance Value, whatever your flavor Mr Cone a settlement is a settlement. If it is such a small pittance then why don’t you pay it personally? Why should the voters pay for Carlos Garcia’s indiscretions or his lawsuit magnetism or his ineptitude as DMC President. The owner needs sell and the team needs to find a new general manager.

There is another settlement.

And another settlement.

Simple facts Ed.

Ed: This is simply not true. The President has acted quickly where he perceived actual
harassment. Further, the SGA was investigated by VPSA Rivera; so far as I know,
no one has ever accused him of any impropriety of action.

JK: Ed, you have said so many times you believe it? Nah, you cant possibly believe that nonsense of a cheer. But nice brown nosing nonetheless, Man,….now CG make sure you credit Mr Cohn with those brownie points cuz he sure did give it that “ole college try”.

Ed: The false accusation that Del Mar does not care about sexual harassment, because
it replaced its EEO officer is (1) untrue; (2) harmful to DM if publicized by a
respected member of the faculty on TV (we all understand Bruce's hyperbole and
don't take it seriously, but the public does not understand and will be
mislead); and (3) best left to the courts.

JK: Dude you should have stopped while you were only brown nosing, no you are attacking a whistle blower and his lively hood.

Ed: At this point, Professor Olson and his associates have discredited themselves as
dispassionate contributors. They clearly seek to embarrass to win what I assume
for now they believe to be a righteous cause. In order for Professor Olson to
begin to regain the credibility he once had, he needs to:

JK: Mr Olson has aligned with the students and in the interest of integrity. His credibility is his and I nor you can remove it from him for revealing the Port Royal SGA fiasco coverup.

Heed the advice form Dr David D Kurz.

I can only assume your email was generated as a result of the recent opinions that a few staff have been posting and verbally expressing. Let's put this in the perspective of a psychologist. A child complains. The parent says, "Shut up or I'll put you up for adoption." (That never works, by the way. But let?s say that it does in this case.) The kid stops complaining out of fear of going to a strange family. Now the parent says, "My child must like it. He isn't complaining, is he?" Problem of complaining solved. Your analogy is good but not complete, the College will have more to say on this in the days to come.

Psychologists have what we believe is a better solution. Does anyone care to hear it? Absolutely!
David D. Kurz/delmar

JK: The Dr is right on target with his assessment. So was Guadalupe Rangel's assessment.

Ed: Sorry to have to write this.

Back to the classroom.

Ed Cohn

JK: See what I mean? Now, it appears you have just wet yourself.

Kenedeno Hardcopy: Del Mar Taxpayer Present and Appearing for Homework

Kenedeno Hardcopy: Del Mar Taxpayer Present and Appearing for Homework

Very Good Point This Morning....

Homero on El Defenzor Live this morning made a very simple but hard hitting observation. He spoke of the Local Soviet Triad and the advocacy for the poor even though they themselves drive Porsche and Mercedes. Les Cassidy I am sure has good intentions and at times i find myself agreeing with him but then that is only the selling point. These guys take issues we have close to our heart and build from the already established group. We in South Texas will use YOU guys every time and not the other way around. Take the beach issue for example. We (the Locals) did it not you. Keep on trying and don't be a quitter then maybe when we do align, it will be out of an earned respect and you guys will appreciate South Texas for something more than a bandwagon. Oh yeah, and paying your bills is a key selling point as well